by kmihelich » Mon May 13, 2013 4:08 pm
I'm really starting to wonder, with the explosion of add-on boards to enable extra functionality for the Pi, at what point does the total cost of the Pi, required accessories, and these add-on boards get so far beyond the cost of using a cheaper platform that has all these features already integrated, that the cost of implementing a solution with a Pi is economically, if not technologically, unsound?
I completely see the capitalistic motives for profiting off of the ever-growing user base, and I don't fault people for exploiting what has proven to be ripe for exploitation; however, there has to be a line drawn in the sand at some point where the platform is simply an endless money pit with the increasing number of third-party hardware implements required for advanced projects. Is the continued providing of add-ons simply a way to further lock people into the platform by spending more and more money to make it better, thus decreasing the desire to switch platforms due to the capital investment already made for this one? At what point do we say, look, you got your feet wet and saw what is available, now instead of spending more money on extras to go further, spend less to switch to something that has everything you want to begin with.
This isn't specifically targeted at you, PeCook, but rather at the larger ecosystem that is forming to perpetuate this idea that you need to buy more to do more as opposed to buy something else to do more, for less. I think these are serious questions to be thought about, if for nothing else than to expose alternative platforms and escape the tunnel vision; to really find the right tool for the right job.
Arch Linux ARM exists and continues to grow through community support, please
donate today!