Performance Testing, NAS325, PPV2, GFnet, PPV3

This forum is for Marvell Kirkwood devices such as the GoFlex Home/Net, PogoPlug v1/v2, SheevaPlug, and ZyXEL devices.

Performance Testing, NAS325, PPV2, GFnet, PPV3

Postby Socaltom » Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:19 pm

I decided to do a little comparison testing on the 4 systems I have available. I used p7zip for the CPu benchmarking, and dd ( dd if=/dev/zero of=/test.txt bs=1M count =1000). Here are the results

P7zip ( results mathematically adjusted to 100% CPU where required)
Goflex net 220 MIPS
Pogo V2 224 MIPS
NAS 325 304 MIPS
Pogo V3 ( overclocked to 850mhz) 306 MIPS

dd performance ( different drives were used so this ins't tremendously meaningful)
V2 31.2 MB/s
V3 52.4 MB/s
Goflex Net 70.9 MB/s
NAS 325 97.6 MB/s

I did this benchmarking, because my main reason for buying the 325 was for monitoring IP cameras with motion. It turns out that while the NAS couldn't keep up with 4 cameras ( CPU load was well over 1 most of the time), the V3 system seems to keep up just fine. ( CPU load was below 2 most of the time). As I understand it the load numbers must be considered against the number of CPUs, since the V3 has dual CPUs, it can tolerate a load up to 2, the NAS only has one CPU, so it can only tolerate 1.
Any ideas why the dual CPU has an advantage here?
Thanks
Tom
used to be owned by me
Pink Pogo V2, Black Pogo V3, Zyxel NAS 325 v1,
used to be Adminstrator for
Goflex net, Black V3, Black V2
Now I have a couple of raspberry pi ( 3+ and 4)
Socaltom
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 2:21 pm
Location: The left side

Re: Performance Testing, NAS325, PPV2, GFnet, PPV3

Postby WarheadsSE » Tue Sep 02, 2014 1:21 am

Technically it is a dual-issue cpu, and not a dual-core, but either way, more frames simultaneously = less pending on the bus = not blocking up.
Core Developer
Remember: Arch Linux ARM is entirely community donation supported!
WarheadsSE
Developer
 
Posts: 6807
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:12 pm


Return to Marvell Kirkwood

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 21 guests