Should wpa_supplicant work?

This forum is for all other ARMv5 devices

Should wpa_supplicant work?

Postby aendruk » Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:47 pm

I don't have any problems when using iwpriv to control CE's rt3390sta driver, but wpa_supplicant fails with "ioctl[SIOCSIWGENIE]: Operation not supported" errors. Am I just doing something wrong, or do I really have to use iwpriv?

Details:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_code('', '# cat /var/lib/wicd/configurations/xxxxxxxxxxxx
ap_scan=1
ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant
network={
ssid="xxx"
scan_ssid=1
proto=WPA RSN
key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
pairwise=CCMP TKIP
group=CCMP TKIP
psk=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
}
# ifconfig ra0 up
# wpa_supplicant -i ra0 -c /var/lib/wicd/configurations/xxxxxxxxxxxx -D wext -dd 2>&1

Trying to associate with xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (SSID='xxx' freq=2437 MHz)
Cancelling scan request
WPA: clearing own WPA/RSN IE
Automatic auth_alg selection: 0x1
RSN: using IEEE 802.11i/D9.0
WPA: Selected cipher suites: group 16 pairwise 16 key_mgmt 2 proto 2
WPA: clearing AP WPA IE
WPA: set AP RSN IE - hexdump(len=22): xx xx xx xx xx xxioctl[SIOCSIWGENIE]: Operation not supported
ioctl[SIOCSIWGENIE]: Operation not supported
xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx
WPA: using GTK CCMP
WPA: using PTK CCMP
WPA: using KEY_MGMT WPA-PSK
WPA: Set own WPA IE default - hexdump(len=22): xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx
No keys have been configured - skip key clearing
State: SCANNING -> ASSOCIATING
wpa_driver_wext_set_operstate: operstate 0->0 (DORMANT)
netlink: Operstate: linkmode=-1, operstate=5
wpa_driver_wext_associate
wpa_driver_wext_set_drop_unencrypted
wpa_driver_wext_set_psk
Association request to the driver failed
Setting authentication timeout: 5 sec 0 usec
EAPOL: External notification - EAP success=0
EAPOL: Supplicant port status: Unauthorized
EAPOL: External notification - EAP fail=0
EAPOL: Supplicant port status: Unauthorized
EAPOL: External notification - portControl=Auto
EAPOL: Supplicant port status: Unauthorized
RTM_NEWLINK: operstate=0 ifi_flags=0x11003 ([UP][LOWER_UP])
RTM_NEWLINK, IFLA_IFNAME: Interface 'ra0' added
Wireless event: cmd=0x8b06 len=8
RTM_NEWLINK: operstate=0 ifi_flags=0x11003 ([UP][LOWER_UP])
RTM_NEWLINK, IFLA_IFNAME: Interface 'ra0' added
Wireless event: cmd=0x8b04 len=12
Authentication with 00:18:02:6f:0a:25 timed out.
Added BSSID 00:18:02:6f:0a:25 into blacklist
No keys have been configured - skip key clearing
State: ASSOCIATING -> DISCONNECTED
')
aendruk
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: Should wpa_supplicant work?

Postby Philoo » Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:51 pm

When you google the error message "WPA: set AP RSN IE operation not supported" it yields old forum discussions (2006-2009) relating mostly to Fedora Core and Intel IPW2200 wireless card. Yet it boils down to support of WEXT or IPW (not sure whether in the kernel or in the driver itself)

the flip is - D ipw or -D wext in your wpa_supplicant command line

see:

http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/i ... 24314.html

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions ... pa-415752/

Hope this helps.
Philoo
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 9:20 pm

Re: Should wpa_supplicant work?

Postby Arktronic » Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:47 pm

I know that with my recompiled 3090 driver I needed to specify WEXT. It might be different with the original one.
Arktronic
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:16 am

Re: Should wpa_supplicant work?

Postby Philoo » Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:15 pm

in that case you're more advanced than I am.
Philoo
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 9:20 pm

Re: Should wpa_supplicant work?

Postby WarheadsSE » Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:48 pm

Psst (it works in 3.1+)
Core Developer
Remember: Arch Linux ARM is entirely community donation supported!
WarheadsSE
Developer
 
Posts: 6807
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:12 pm

Re: Should wpa_supplicant work?

Postby Philoo » Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:02 pm

you mean the one here http://ppl.ug/Ze91Jqp1MEg/
Philoo
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 9:20 pm


Return to Community Supported

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests