by capchap » Thu Aug 14, 2014 4:29 pm
WarheadsSE
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ell, we're certainly not paying the $250+ USD for this.
Do you ever give complete answers about anything?
However you are the first person to make any comment at all regarding this particular part of this issue.
So thanks for that, I do appreciate it at least I know the project wont be funded by archlinux
I already explained that I understand if it is cost prohibitive as I have no idea what the investment strategy/resources/etc. or how projects like this are taken on/funded.
So your comment was totally unnecessary, condescending, probably intended to be derogatory, AND, does not explain what who would need to do what to effect a solution.
If such a solution were disclosed, possibly other archlinux users would want to become involved and offset the expense of making this happen. if you're not familiar with ioncube and its loader, it allows authors to encrypt their code so they can sell it, and end-users can't see it. This keeps their source hidden form hackers and thieves. I'm sure you could have sorted that out though.
My interest in ioncube loader is that my web site application requires ioncube to run, so I was testing this environment to see if it would run or not. I would be VERY excited if it could.
Without ioncube, this platform has no value to me...so if the only limitation is $250, I might be interested in paying the fee myself.
However, I have zero interest in paying ioncube if I have no idea if dev-team would do what is necessary or even if I need dev-team to do anything, or if there is any hope of success at all or what level of on-going support might be put in place if the project were continued somehow.
if you are only going to give terse, condescending responses, please don't respond at all.
Otherwise, I would really appreciate knowing what it might take to move forward.
Thanks for cooperating,